What does it take to change the world, to change the course of history? Invariably, you must gain the support of the people. Monarchs prevailed for centuries (and still do in some places) because people let them. People don’t know how to stand up for themselves and think for themselves. They are hopelessly Dead and submissive. Just look at how many people submit to Yahweh, the most psychotic god there has ever been. Therefore, someone who commands the hearts and minds of the Dead commands the fate of the world. But what are the masses in thrall to? Consumerism, celebrities, social media, brand names, movies and TV shows, Yahweh…
Are these things remotely good? Will they produce good people (and thus a good world)? Or will they only increase the people’s neuroticism?
There is but one secret to controlling the world: Yahweh (God) himself, the World Controller.
No matter who or what we are right now, we can shift dramatically to something different. Most people undergo what we call passive change, i.e., they change gradually without meaning to. Active change, on the other hand, involves a conscious commitment and constant effort. It requires a will unlike any you will find among the Dead.
Most people don’t effect real change in their lives. They can change their lives, if they only knew it. They can help to change the world, but rather than being heroes and beacons for the rest of humanity, most choose to remain ignorant in their comfortable little worlds, which are full of what the Kardashians are doing at any given time, or concerned with any number of reality TV fads. They are the people who watch talent shows because they themselves have no talent. They watch shows made by more intelligent people because they themselves have no intelligence.
Why are people this way? Because culture tells them to be. It rejects people who aren’t keeping up with the news and gossip, who behave like “nerds.” Foolish people – wanting to know things! Who wants to know anything? Wouldn’t you rather play football or basketball? Wouldn’t you rather watch this mind-numbing TV show about these bitchy housewives?
Everything’s for dummies. Why? Because people are dummies. If people weren’t dummies, then content for dummies wouldn’t be necessary.
If change is a miracle, the Dead are the mundane people who are baffled by them. Don’t you want to understand miracles? Don’t you want to perform them? Don’t you want to be a miracle worker?
There were many heresies perpetrated against the Catholic Church. At any point, any of these heresies could have overtaken Catholicism and become the “true” Christianity. In fact, who’s to say they haven’t? The Church of five centuries ago would view the current Church as an absolute abomination.
Many of Christianity’s heresies make more sense than the accepted religion. To show you what we mean, we’ll consider a contrast between regular Christianity and Adoptionist Christianity.
In Christianity, Jesus was the son of God, as a spirit (how spirits can have children is a mystery – clearly, the God-Jesus father-son arrangement was modelled after the physical world, and was therefore invented by humans). He was created perfectly virtuous, and if you believe in the Trinity, he was God himself – the most perfect being possible. He then became incarnate as a man (but was still somehow God), and taught mankind to be virtuous, then died on the cross for humanity’s sins. He was supposedly the only perfect human since Adam and Eve in their initial Eden state.
In Adoptionism, Jesus was born as a regular human. He was an extremely virtuous Jewish preacher – so virtuous, in fact, that God decided that he would adopt Jesus as his own son.
In Adoptionism, Jesus, rather than being born perfect, was born imperfect and overcame his imperfect nature in order to attain the title “son of God.” He sets an example to all of us – it’s not about where you were born or who you were born to; it’s about the merit you have as an individual – what deeds you do and what words you say.
Regular Christianity is all about nepotism – Jesus is where he is because of what family he was born into, because of who he knows. He’s perfect, so he can’t sin.
Adoptionism is all about talent and deeds – Jesus is where he is because he earned that position through great effort; he overcame his evil nature out of a pure desire to do good and to help others.
Which Jesus is more admirable? Which Jesus would you rather listen to?
If a god is born a god, then they really aren’t worthy of worship, are they? – after all, they have done nothing to earn it. They have done nothing difficult or arduous. They have made no personal sacrifices for their godhood. Yahweh says he was born a god. Is there any more pathetic image? Would you rather follow a privileged cunt or a hero who took great pains to get where he is?
Though most people are not privileged, they are on the side of privilege. They support a god of privilege and they support privileged people by working for them, serving them, wiping their asses for them.
The first big change that must occur on earth is a shift from privilege to merit. As soon as that happens, Yahweh will be well and truly buried. He is already dead – his funeral just needs to be arranged.
Always, people bafflingly support privileged cunts with no talent. What had Donald Trump ever done for America before he was elected? What has he done for it now? What has Boris Johnson, former mayor of London and well-known privileged prick, ever done for the UK?
Traditionally, Jesus had two natures: man and god. He had two wills, one for each. He therefore had two personalities.
And yet, Jesus the Man was still perfect. He was human, but he was also perfect – doesn’t that sound like a contradiction in terms? Aren’t humans defined as imperfect by Christianity?
The myth of Jesus was clearly invented by someone who wanted to have their cake and eat it. He was a man, but he was also divine … he was a man, but he was also perfect … he was a humble carpenter, but he was also a great king and ruler!
Make up your mind! Either he was a privileged cunt (regular Christianity) and therefore loses any sympathy from a self-respecting human being, or he was a humble human who worked his way up the Great Chain of Being (Adoptionism) and therefore worthy of admiration. You cannot have both. Take your pick – nepotism or talent: which is truly divine?
The Yahwists have a catastrophic view of God. It’s time it was corrected.
Human asks for your respect: “Respect must be earned!”
God demands your respect for no other reason than that he has a certain rank: “I see nothing wrong with that!”
Human you’ve never met wants you to love them: “But I don’t even know you!”
God you’ve never met demands that you love him under threat of a punishment: “This is the most reasonable thing I’ve ever heard, I think I’d like to worship this God!”
In their religious arrogance, Christians go on about love and personal relationships – but in the context of God they seem to forget what these things are all about. You cannot love someone you’ve never met because you don’t know them, and if a stranger demanded your love, one thing you might say to such a person is, “Fuck you!” So why is God treated any differently? Because he has a certain position, a certain rank. It’s never about actual merit or actual virtue. These real concepts are discarded in favor of a privileged cunt ordaining what is right and wrong among his followers in a way that suits him. And if you disagree, well, you’d better like getting burned alive!
God is just another tyrant, and every sane, reasonable person has had enough of his rule. We need a revolution.
True gods are born on the battlefield. They are the product of absolute conviction and absolute knowledge. Anyone who imagines that gods are born out of nowhere or have always existed as they currently do, and therefore don’t have to do anything to earn their remarkable knowledge and power, is a deluded supporter of privilege over talent.
Which do you support? Privilege? Why would you? You’re only screwing yourself over since you’re probably not very privileged yourself. You’re just supporting people higher than you, who have no problem shitting on you from the top of their ivory towers. The Death of God means the death of privilege. Any supporter of merit and talent must support the death of God. It’s a matter of simple logic.
The clearest example of privilege in the modern world is that of the “royal family” of the UK.
The monarchy’s website says of queen Elizabeth II, “Although The Sovereign no longer has a political or executive role, he or she continues to play an important part in the life of the nation.”
An important part? Clearly, monarchies aren’t needed anymore. America gets along just fine without a privileged cunt in a big palace. Why does the UK need one?
“The Queen sees public and voluntary service as one of the most important elements of her work. The Queen has links - as Royal Patron or President - with over 600 charities, military associations, professional bodies and public service organisations. These vary from well-established international charities to smaller bodies working in a specialist area or on a local basis only.
“Her patronages and charities cover a wide range of issues, from opportunities for young people, to the preservation of wildlife and the environment. Having Her Majesty as Royal patron or president provides vital publicity for the work of these organisations, and allows their enormous achievements and contributions to society to be recognised.”
Charity is Stupidese for, “Our State doesn’t directly support all the causes worth supporting (monetarily or in terms of policy), so we have to do it instead.” Charity is what privileged cunts participate in to convince the world that they are still needed. They’re not. In an ideal world, the State would and should support all worthy causes.
Let’s run through the logic of monarchy. Because the queen just happened to be born into the royal family, she is inherently better than you (this is reflected in her titles: “Her Majesty” being one of them; you must address her in this way to acknowledge her superiority and special rank), you must live in subjection to her (you are her subject, not an equal), and she is entitled to benefits you will never have even if you work your ass off 24 hours a day for every single day of your adulthood purely for the benefit of others.
The queen has done nothing to earn this position. In fact, she put as much effort into being a royal as you did – which is to say, none at all. Yet she gets the position, you don’t.
But being queen isn’t all about enjoying herself, is it? Think of all the duties she has to perform. Let’s see. She reads letters (or, rather, her servant reads them to her while she drinks tea), she throws garden parties, she conducts ceremonies (such as those surrounding honors), she assembles with all her other brat relatives for photos, she goes to charity events and makes charity visits, she makes (extremely boring, uninspiring, uninspired) speeches completely devoid of any personal passion (she almost certainly doesn’t write them herself), she “acts as a focus for national identity, unity and pride; gives a sense of stability and continuity; officially recognises success and excellence; and supports the ideal of voluntary service,” she goes on “state visits” (i.e., formalized vacations), she reads reports and decides whether or not they are bullshit.
Wow … that sounds so difficult. The reality is that most people would prefer to do that kind of work over the work they actually do. Will the queen ever work in a call center and have to make thousands of calls every day? Will any of her dear relatives ever be spotted shifting pallets in a warehouse (with absurdly high targets)? The very idea is ludicrous. For all their pretense of being humble, they never actually make themselves humble.
Humble is living on minimum wage – a sum of money that many people on earth actually earn less than, by the way. Humble is being uncertain about your future wellbeing. Humble is getting by despite unfavorable circumstances. Humble is making the very best out of very little.
When has the queen ever done anything that put her future in jeopardy? Which of her duties involves not knowing whether she’ll have enough money for food next month? Which part of her “work” includes having to plan her very limited finances after working for a month in a job she doesn’t enjoy and which drains her physically and mentally? What personal sacrifices has she made for her “charity work?” The queen has no idea what austerity is.
The word “philanthropist” (ancient Greek: philo “love” + anthropos “human”) means “lover of humanity.” Philanthropists and charity goons (like the queen) will only ever support worthy causes as far as it causes them no detriment. They will certainly never give away all their money and live poor like Saint Francis of Assisi. Saint Francis was a man you could take seriously – he didn’t just make a show of poverty, he lived in poverty.
The “royal family” is humble? Try telling that to Diogenes the Dog, a beggar by choice rather than by circumstance, deriding society’s complications and lies. Diogenes was a man you could take seriously – he didn’t sit there all day reading out speeches with no impetus like a robot; he passionately believed what he said, and he was prepared to live with almost no means at all in order to demonstrate his philosophy.
The queen is a woman you can’t take seriously. She talks about austerity, yet she lives quite comfortably. She makes a show of supporting worthy causes, but never does so in a way that will actually change anything. She and her family do charity work because if they didn’t, the UK would realize how irrelevant and unwanted they really are.
It’s actually insane that people see nothing wrong with monarchy, that they don’t care enough to do anything about it. The queen is nothing more than a privileged, nepotistic cunt just like the God she makes a show of supporting.
Take a look at the queen’s amazing and world-changing Christmas speech for last year:
No doubt she will have an equally riveting broadcast for everyone this year!
This is the kind of speech you give when you’re given a school assignment, not when you’re really passionate about something. But hey, at least she’s cosplaying Spok!
Predictions: this year, the queen will make some commendation aimed at health workers and also at the ordinary people who followed the lockdown rules. She’ll make some comment about how COVID-19 has tested us all. She’ll make some reflection on the qualities we must express in the future to defeat COVID.
Imagine that, in ages gone by, there was a hero whose conduct passed quickly into legend, and then into myth. While he still walked the earth, there were many myths surrounding him. Nowadays, no one knows his name or what he did, but he had such an impact on the human mind, his story can still be felt now.
There are certain mental patterns that we all share. We can all access them. Jung called these archetypes. They constitute what Jung called the collective unconscious, a kind of collective mind we inherit from our parents. If physical genes can be passed down, what “mental” genes may our parents give to us?
Sometimes, there are people who live spectacular lives unimaginable to the ordinary person. These stories pass into our personal unconscious, and then into the collective unconscious. The more minds a story impacted, the more prevalence it will have. The events of yesteryear impact us now. History repeats itself because most people are just following patterns in their heads – patterns that were laid down before they were born. In some sense, the lives of the Dead are preordained.
How many stories follow preordained patterns and structures? The similarities are everywhere, and the stories in which they appear mean something to us because they reflect the collective (and perhaps our personal) unconscious. Everything profound comes from there.
Imagine that humans are not in fact in full control of themselves, that they are instead ruled by a collective unconsciousness that almost completely controls their behavior. The bystander effect is the collective mind at work. Few people are capable of breaking out of this collective mind. Someone who can influence the collective mind can sway the course of history.
Throughout our entire existence, the greatest influencers have always been those with selfish intentions. That’s why our world is a bad, wicked place.
But deep within our psyche, the echoes (archetypes) of the great heroes remain – the true gods. One day, those echoes will come to the surface, and everyone will become a hero, a speaker, someone who takes dictation only from themselves.
To find the divine echoes, we need only look within ourselves.
The mind is like a radio. We can either remain on the same station we’ve visited all our life, or we can tune into something new, something inspiring.
Whenever something happens, it always leaves an imprint. History is always recorded. It’s embedded into the fabric of things. An echo might be associated with a person, or a place. It might manifest only in certain situations, or only ever by accident. Some echoes are malicious; others are godly. They are not alive, but they are channeled and shared by living souls.
The gods are those who maximally expressed the divine (godly) imprints. In doing so, they strengthened said imprints, making them more likely to rise to the surface again. The more common and popular an imprint is, the more likely it is to arise in the future. Humanity has always chosen the wrong imprints, never the godly ones.
Yeshua ben Yosef left a very strong echo. After his death (or ascension into heaven, if you believe that nonsense), his life became increasingly embellished. The Jesus echo bears almost no resemblance to the Yeshua echo (Yeshua is Jesus’ real, Jewish name). Jesus is a myth; Yeshua was a historical person.
The echoes we channel must drastically change. Jesus must be ousted.
It only takes a small nudge to radically change the trajectory of a falling object. 2,000 years ago, Jesus and a few others changed the trajectory of the world completely. Had Jesus never been born, the world would look extremely different. We can correct its course with just the same nudge.
The Old Testament
Here’s the truth about the Old Testament: It is a collection of politically-motivated Yahwist revisionist and negationist texts that people saw and thought, “that looks like it was written by the creator of the cosmos!” There’s absolutely nothing more to it than that! The Yahwists’ revisionism has tainted the entirety of world history. None of it can ever be removed. What we can do is ensure that humanity has a more healthy view of the Bible: the correct view.
If children were told the truth about the Bible – namely, what we have said above – rather than fed dogmatic nonsense, Yahwism would become a minor sect within a single generation. God would be well and truly buried. Without child brainwashing, Yahwism would no longer be an established tradition. It would be remarkably easy for other, healthier religions based on truth to take its place.
It’s customary for Christians to conclude that anyone who opposes their god is a devil-worshiper. It never occurs to them that they are the devil-worshipers, and that everyone else is much closer to God than they are. That’s something that they mustn’t consider. It will undermine their faith if they think seriously about it. It’s a Forbidden Idea.
Faith forbids ideas. Ideas destroy faith.
Other Forbidden Ideas include:
- God does not exist
- Multiple gods exist
- Jesus was a liar
- The Gospels are fantasy documents
Faith forbids thinking seriously about these statements. It mandates that they be dismissed immediately. But why? Why is Yahweh so afraid of being challenged? Because he knows that if the rebellious spirit prevails among people, then he will no longer be the ruler of the world. He’s not a real god and he has no real power over individuals. He’s trying to oppose nature, but in doing so, he only helps it along. If humanity can overcome Yahweh’s oppression, we will be greater than we ever were.
Imagine that long ago, while humanity was still developing, it was stuck in a rut. For millions of years, it had remained more or less the same. It wasn’t greatly advancing, but wasn’t receding either. It was stagnant, plodding on and on with the same old lives over and over.
But then, angels became interested in this species. They were born among us, and they became wise men and mystics. Evil ones also became incarnate here, to oppose the angels’ efforts. The angels offered humanity the most precious gift of all: the fruit of knowledge.
Suddenly, humanity changed. It underwent a staggeringly large alteration within the span of a few generations. Our minds became vastly more sophisticated; our entire reality changed.
The reason why humanity is so antiquated and backwards is that this change didn’t happen hundreds of millennia ago; it happened only several thousand years ago. Many features of pre-modern humans are still aspects of our society not because they have any value, but because humanity hasn’t yet grown up enough to leave them behind. They are all to be eliminated in due course.
It’s all to come. It’s all part of our evolution.
Yet Yahwism is centered around devolution, receding into the primordial slime. If we’re not alive, we can’t sin, right? In fact, why doesn’t every Christian commit suicide (suicide’s a sin, depending on who you ask, but a) is this sin worth a lifetime of further sin? and b) you can always go to purgatory or whatever and repent for that)? Doesn’t that make perfect sense? You’ll go straight to heaven, after all. Why spend time living at all? Murder your child as soon as they get baptized – then you can be sure they’ll never stray from God and you’ll get to spend an eternity with them (murder’s also a sin, but there’s no crime God won’t forgive, apparently, through Jesus’ sacrifice, which was itself a murder!!! Two wrongs don’t make a right!). While you’re at it, why not murder all unbelievers and heretics? – God knows their place, doesn’t he? Yes, God said not to kill, but since when have his people obeyed that commandment? You’re not telling anyone you’re against murder when holy wars have been waged in God’s name. The Bible itself says that there are excuses for killing, such as when someone breaks God’s law.
Christianity and logic don’t mix well. Whenever the two are put together, chaos ensues. Christianity is an irrational and delusional religion.
Here’s a PSA to all Christian leaders who think they’re appointed by God: you’re not! Read Exodus 4:1-9:
4:1 And Moses answered and said, But, behold, they will not believe me, nor hearken unto my voice: for they will say, The LORD hath not appeared unto thee.
4:2 And the LORD said unto him, What is that in thine hand? And he said, A rod.
4:3 And he said, Cast it on the ground. And he cast it on the ground, and it became a serpent; and Moses fled from before it.
4:4 And the LORD said unto Moses, Put forth thine hand, and take it by the tail. And he put forth his hand, and caught it, and it became a rod in his hand:
4:5 That they may believe that the LORD God of their fathers, the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob, hath appeared unto thee.
4:6 And the LORD said furthermore unto him, Put now thine hand into thy bosom. And he put his hand into his bosom: and when he took it out, behold, his hand was leprous as snow.
4:7 And he said, Put thine hand into thy bosom again. And he put his hand into his bosom again; and plucked it out of his bosom, and, behold, it was turned again as his other flesh.
4:8 And it shall come to pass, if they will not believe thee, neither hearken to the voice of the first sign, that they will believe the voice of the latter sign.
4:9 And it shall come to pass, if they will not believe also these two signs, neither hearken unto thy voice, that thou shalt take of the water of the river, and pour it upon the dry land: and the water which thou takest out of the river shall become blood upon the dry land.
God gave Moses not one, but three miracles to approach the Israelites and Pharaoh with. If the LORD hath appeared unto you, where are your miracles? If the LORD hath appointed you, where are your signs to prove it?
According to the Bible, Jesus didn’t simply say he was the son of God; he performed miracles to prove it.
Every Christian leader who claims to have been appointed by God is therefore a non-Christian who goes against the Bible – unless they can perform miracles.
Yahweh gained a reputation on earth by claiming to be an omnister: he claimed to be omnibenevolent, omniscient, omnipotent, and so on. He promotes privilege by claiming that he was always an omnister. He promotes hatred of humanity by disparaging us from his high pedestal (it is of course easy for someone who was born into privilege to mock and judge those in the lower classes). He is therefore a person who lacks empathy and sympathy – a psychopathic deity.
Reality is nothing but a series of games. For most people, losing an important game like those found in life is too discouraging. They never try again, they never hone their skills at the game. That’s why Yahweh’s gospel of instant salvation appeals to people. They are hopeless at the game and know that they could never attain salvation themselves, so they buy into lies that tell them they will be handed salvation on a silver platter as long as they do X, Y, and Z.
Unfortunately, psychopaths are better than many people at most games. They don’t mind stepping on or deceiving others in exchange for gain. Where most would have a conscience and prohibit themselves from doing certain things, psychopaths don’t care.
So, psychopaths aren’t the best at the game – they aren’t even good at it, particularly – but they are better than most earthlings, so that’s why they are on top. People always say that evil will never win in the end, and ultimately, that’s true, but that doesn’t mean they can’t win in the meantime.
And who lets them win? The ordinary people on the street. There are measures the world could put in place to ensure that psychopaths don’t win, but these are always ignored. We don’t have a problem with psychopaths, they think. In fact, we have the biggest problem conceivable – half of the world is under the rule of a psychopathic deity who promotes privilege rather than talent. But in the game, talent is all that matters in the end. What you can do has a bearing on your soul; who you know has nothing to do with your soul and everything to do with your earthly body.
The world is a mess because a) psychopaths are in charge, and b) no one in any important positions recognizes the problem.
Historically, all prophets have been psychopaths and sociopaths who don’t mind lying to others as long as it leads to benefit for them. They will straight-up fabricate the word of God. The Prophets were those who reflected the neuroticism of the Jews as a whole, their resentment at being defeated militarily and deported or occupied.
We’re not very sympathetic with the Jews on the whole. We regard the various persecutions they have endured as outrageous, and we regard them that way for exactly the same reason as we regard Yahweh as an abhorrent god. After all, the Hebrew Bible itself speaks of the horrors he sanctioned so that the Israelites could have somewhere to live. He promised them a land that already belonged to others and sanctioned the death of everyone who dwelled there. Is exterminating the population of sixty cities any less morally disgusting than the holocaust? And yet, because it’s religion, because it’s God, this moral crime is ignored while the holocaust is condemned.
If you support the kind of god described in the Bible, you lose all sympathy when you’re persecuted yourselves.
The holocaust was an utterly despicable event that we condemn in every possible way. We do not support, condone, or encourage acts of abuse or violence toward believers. By the same token, the Bible describes events on an equal level of horror. If you think God commanded those actions, you are deluded and you are in need of a reality check. Only Yahweh, the god of psychopathy, would command such things. If you seriously imagine that an omnibenevolent god would command such wanton violence and destruction then you have the most twisted idea of God imaginable.
The world admires psychopaths. Just look at Trump. He’s on his way out now, but that doesn’t change the fact that he got elected in the first place, and millions of Americans still think he’s the best thing since sliced bread. They won’t shut up about how great he is. They are convinced he’s a hero.
How could this catastrophic conflation of hero and psychopath come about? Consider some traits of psychopaths:
- Psychopaths tend to be in positions of power because of their lack of empathy, so they have authority.
- Psychopaths will never admit that they’re wrong, which makes them project a deific image of infallibility. (People are in love with infallibility for some bizarre reason.)
- Psychopaths can exhibit grandiosity, meaning they think they are greater and more important than everyone else.
- Psychopaths tend to be strong people (i.e., they can get what they want) because they aren’t hindered by moral concerns.
- Psychopaths exhibit a superficial charm that allows them to win people over.
In short, psychopaths are appealing people, and to some (particularly those who lack power and are dissatisfied with their life), psychopathy is an appealing condition. That’s why psychopaths are called heroes. The truth is of course that they are the very opposite of heroes. They are always the ones who try to stop, manipulate, and exploit the heroes.
Learn to recognize psychopathy. Trump is a pure example. Study how he behaves; how he dismisses every controversy in favor of his narrative about fake news; how he never admits that he’s wrong, even when he is; how he bigs himself up, calling himself humble in one Tweet and referring to himself as a “stable genius” in another; how he still insists, in the face of undeniable evidence, that he won the election (psychopaths can never admit defeat; they’re obsessed with gaining power); the emotionless way he speaks, even while he’s trying to ruin a reporter’s career. Nothing will ever damage Trump’s deified image of himself. Nothing will ever truly defeat him. He’s always back for more, always pursuing power with an extreme focus on his goal. He never gets “distracted” by the moral implications of anything he does. He’s all business and marketing, nothing else.
Trump would be a martyr, but he’s far too cowardly to sacrifice himself or his own reputation for a cause. So he keeps droning on about how he’s won, how the election was rigged. Psychopaths don’t lose. How could the hero Trump be voted out? It’s because those filthy Dems rigged the election and committed widespread election fraud (despite the penalties they could have incurred). On the one hand, election fraud has been a problem for years (so why wasn’t Trump launching inquiries and firing off lawsuits left and right when he was elected in 2016?), and on the other, this election has an unprecedented fraud level!
It doesn’t matter to Trump whether or not election fraud is going on; all that matters to him is that he’s lost the election, so he’s going to find any excuse to ignore the result and stay in as president. The question of whether or not there is fraud is only pertinent insofar as it might help Trump in his quest for power and adoration. Psychopaths don’t have any morality, so Trump is okay with the idea that he was elected on a fraudulent basis.
All you need to do to have a perfect image of what a psychopath is like is look at Trump. He’s a textbook example. We might speculate that he has a psychopathic soul.
Who benefitted the most from a Trump presidency? TRUMP. Who would benefit the most from a second Trump term? TRUMP. Who would a second Trump term be in favor of? TRUMP. Who do Trump’s businesses enrich? TRUMP. Who do Trump’s lies serve? TRUMP. It’s all about the Trump, not about the American people. Trump has no sense of history or legacy. He typifies everything negative about America. He fulfils every negative stereotype about Americans. He´s the worst America has to offer.
Humanity must work to defeat the psychopaths, the false omnisters. They have nothing to offer you. They have nothing to offer the public good, which they actively resent and trash.
Empathy and Sympathy
Empathy is the ability to imagine what another person is feeling. Sympathy is the ability to feel what someone else is feeling – probably because you yourself have been through something similar. Sympathy is a much deeper connection than empathy, and it requires a mind that has experienced much more adversity than a privileged person.
Is it any wonder that privileged people are often psychopaths? They are always pampered and taken complete care of. They are never allowed to confront their own challenges, instead relying on the wealth of their parents to get them out of everything. They never cultivate their talents, since they’ll have no trouble getting a job based on their connections.
Many video games are based around one simple axis: power. The more powerful a game makes you feel, the more appealing it is – as long as the acquisition of said power doesn’t involve too much challenge.
Video games allow people to go on the adventures they’re too cowardly to make in real life, and confront the challenges they should be confronting for real.
Old myths and fairy tales speak of heroes who overcame great adversity to accomplish something for the public good: those are the only true heroes. Psychopaths plainly don’t fit the bill, and neither do most video games. They’re all about privilege, chosen ones, and so on.
NPC stands for “non-player character.” It’s any character in a video game that isn’t controlled by a player. If the players are the heroes, then the NPCs are everyone else. Most people in real life are indistinguishable from NPCs: their behavior is predictable; they always talk about the same things over and over; they never accomplish anything meaningful. They are just background noise, and most of them aren’t pertinent at all to the overarching objective of the game.
The eschaton is the end times, as described in several eshatologies, such as that of Christianity (found primarily in the Book of Revelation). In Christianity, the eschaton is described as a period of judgement when every human will be put in their place by the psychopathic Yahweh. Of course, a true psychopath like Yahweh cannot make moral judgements, so this eschatology is nonsense.
Historically, many Christians thought very negatively of Judaism. They called it evil, an abomination. Some still think this way. Of course, they didn’t (and don’t) seem to grasp the fact that Jesus, their precious savior, was a Jew, and that, were it not for Judaism, Christianity wouldn’t just be dead, it would be non-existent. But, hey, what do facts matter when faith rolls into town?
Faithfuls never pay any attention to facts that don’t support their beliefs. That’s what faith is all about. Christians carved an identity separate from the Jews, and now Jewish and Christian beliefs contradict each other. Because of this contradiction, Christians automatically designated Judaism as wrong, sinful, and evil. Even Yahweh’s own denatured religions cannot agree with each other! The Bible says that a house divided against itself cannot stand … in that case, just move them to different houses!
The Bible describes Yahweh as the creator – the ultimate creator of all things. In fact, heroic humans are creators. Yahweh is a parasite who tells creators they must worship him. They never do.
Yahweh only cares about creators, about the Raised and the Living. The Dead are merely his servants, his worshipers, the ones who refuel his ego.
Several of Yahweh’s angels have had the dubious honor of participating in Biblical events. In every case, they are self-centered Yahwists who lie relentlessly. If you think Trump’s bad for psychopathy, you should have met Jesus. Numerous occurrences in the Gospels preserve Jesus’ self-centered, self-serving, psychopathic nature. An example is when he is anointed at Bethany, a story told in all four Gospels. See for yourself:
26:6 Now when Jesus was in Bethany, in the house of Simon the leper,
26:7 There came unto him a woman having an alabaster box of very precious ointment, and poured it on his head, as he sat at meat.
26:8 But when his disciples saw it, they had indignation, saying, To what purpose is this waste?
26:9 For this ointment might have been sold for much, and given to the poor.
26:10 When Jesus understood it, he said unto them, Why trouble ye the woman? for she hath wrought a good work upon me.
26:11 For ye have the poor always with you; but me ye have not always.
26:12 For in that she hath poured this ointment on my body, she did it for my burial.
26:13 Verily I say unto you, Wheresoever this gospel shall be preached in the whole world, there shall also this, that this woman hath done, be told for a memorial of her.
14:3 And being in Bethany in the house of Simon the leper, as he sat at meat, there came a woman having an alabaster box of ointment of spikenard very precious; and she brake the box, and poured it on his head.
14:4 And there were some that had indignation within themselves, and said, Why was this waste of the ointment made?
14:5 For it might have been sold for more than three hundred pence, and have been given to the poor. And they murmured against her.
14:6 And Jesus said, Let her alone; why trouble ye her? she hath wrought a good work on me.
14:7 For ye have the poor with you always, and whensoever ye will ye may do them good: but me ye have not always.
14:8 She hath done what she could: she is come aforehand to anoint my body to the burying.
14:9 Verily I say unto you, Wheresoever this gospel shall be preached throughout the whole world, this also that she hath done shall be spoken of for a memorial of her.
7:36 And one of the Pharisees desired him that he would eat with him. And he went into the Pharisee's house, and sat down to meat.
7:37 And, behold, a woman in the city, which was a sinner, when she knew that Jesus sat at meat in the Pharisee's house, brought an alabaster box of ointment,
7:38 And stood at his feet behind him weeping, and began to wash his feet with tears, and did wipe them with the hairs of her head, and kissed his feet, and anointed them with the ointment.
7:39 Now when the Pharisee which had bidden him saw it, he spake within himself, saying, This man, if he were a prophet, would have known who and what manner of woman this is that toucheth him: for she is a sinner.
7:40 And Jesus answering said unto him, Simon, I have somewhat to say unto thee. And he saith, Master, say on.
7:41 There was a certain creditor which had two debtors: the one owed five hundred pence, and the other fifty.
7:42 And when they had nothing to pay, he frankly forgave them both. Tell me therefore, which of them will love him most?
7:43 Simon answered and said, I suppose that he, to whom he forgave most. And he said unto him, Thou hast rightly judged.
7:44 And he turned to the woman, and said unto Simon, Seest thou this woman? I entered into thine house, thou gavest me no water for my feet: but she hath washed my feet with tears, and wiped them with the hairs of her head.
7:45 Thou gavest me no kiss: but this woman since the time I came in hath not ceased to kiss my feet.
7:46 My head with oil thou didst not anoint: but this woman hath anointed my feet with ointment.
7:47 Wherefore I say unto thee, Her sins, which are many, are forgiven; for she loved much: but to whom little is forgiven, the same loveth little.
7:48 And he said unto her, Thy sins are forgiven.
7:49 And they that sat at meat with him began to say within themselves, Who is this that forgiveth sins also?
7:50 And he said to the woman, Thy faith hath saved thee; go in peace.
12:3 Then took Mary a pound of ointment of spikenard, very costly, and anointed the feet of Jesus, and wiped his feet with her hair: and the house was filled with the odour of the ointment.
12:4 Then saith one of his disciples, Judas Iscariot, Simon's son, which should betray him,
12:5 Why was not this ointment sold for three hundred pence, and given to the poor?
12:6 This he said, not that he cared for the poor; but because he was a thief, and had the bag, and bare what was put therein.
12:7 Then said Jesus, Let her alone: against the day of my burying hath she kept this.
12:8 For the poor always ye have with you; but me ye have not always.
Note that John attempts to claim that only Judas, the traitor, complained about the issue. Mark and Matthew say that all the apostles were indignant. (And in Luke, the story is turned into a tale involving a Pharisee, in which Jesus claims that the woman’s sins are forgiven just because she anointed him! He even implies that those who have committed more sins love God more(!) – “…but to whom little is forgiven, the same loveth little.”)
So, here we see Jesus enjoying a luxury, which was completely against what he preached (he always said that money and worldly enjoyment mattered nothing compared to the purpose of God), and when he’s called out on it he says, “Oh, well, there will always be poor people. Besides, it’s a nice thing she’s done for me – I won’t always be here, will I?” In other words, “I’m entitled to expensive things, everyone else isn’t. If you worry about getting expensive luxuries, you’re a worshiper of mammon, but when I do it, I’m the holiest man on earth.”
Jesus’ apostles would never have thought of having any expensive ointment used on them. Jesus said, “Blessed are the poor…” but there’s nothing more contradictory of that than someone who takes no actions to help the poor. Jesus was the lip-service prophet.
We all have our own phantoms. A phantom is in essence a hallucination, but it may be more broadly categorized as a delusion or an extra-sensory perception. A phantom is something we perceive, but which doesn’t have any substantial existence. It’s a False Thing.
For believers, God is a phantom. He has no real existence, but he is “perceived” in the world around us. Psalm 19 says:
19:1 The heavens declare the glory of God; and the firmament sheweth his handywork.
19:2 Day unto day uttereth speech, and night unto night sheweth knowledge.
19:3 There is no speech nor language, where their voice is not heard.
They “know” God through his works.
If, however, the heavens and earth are the work of something or someone else (which they are) then they have a false perception; they “know” a phantom. Their god isn’t really there; he exists only in their perceptions.
An atheist believes in phantasmal, illusory morals. A Hindu believes in phantom karma. A Muslim might believe in phantom Djinn.
Phantoms are everywhere. The world is ruled by them. Phantoms come from our beliefs, our perceptions, our thoughts. They have no substantial existence by themselves (i.e., they are not made of real substances outside of our own minds) – but they still exist. Your dreams exist, even though they don’t exist by themselves. Easily the most astounding trait of mind is that it is able to dream things up that do not exist. Mind does not operate purely on reality; it also operates on itself. In fact, all our thoughts are phantoms. They do exist, but only as structures within our minds. They don’t exist by themselves.
We can perceive real things, but we can also perceive unreal things. From the mind’s perspective, what’s the difference? You experience your dreams as real. God is real to whoever happens to imagine that he exists – but not in a substantial way; in a mental way. People’s thoughts about God are what matters, not God himself. Your experience of dreams are what matters, not dreams themselves.
With this “phantom” concept in mind, is it really surprising that people can dream up all kinds of irrational things that have no placement in reality itself? Humanity has never learned to properly distinguish phantoms from reality; to do so requires extra effort. If you ask a believer what distinguishes their thoughts from reality, they will have no idea. In fact, most people have no idea. That’s why they accept phantoms.
Sometimes, our thoughts reflect a genuine reality, but much of the time they only reflect ourselves. They revolve around phantoms. Society expertly constructs phantoms, meaning that we must go above and beyond society to find reality.
Spirituality is all about our personal journey. It has nothing to do with God and everything to do with becoming a better person. The omnisters (i.e., gods) have absolutely no interest in what you do or wear. They have no interest in micromanaging your affairs. They have no interest whatever in dictating what you believe or attracting your worship. Only Yahweh concerns himself with these things. Why? Because he’s a psychopath, a narcissist. He doesn’t care about you, only about himself and his name.
Most people believe God to be a psychopath; he is anything but. Humanity’s twisted idea of divinity must be dispelled before we can all move on from the barbaric, bronze-age thinking of Yahweh.